|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Marijuana
Arrests By County 1995 - 1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1995 to 1997 |
|
|
| NAME |
TL |
AQ |
RATE |
TL |
AQ |
RATE |
TL |
AQ |
RATE |
RANK |
CHANGE |
RANK |
|
|
| Daviess |
44 |
1 |
154.4 |
55 |
1.2 |
191.7 |
65 |
1.2 |
225.7 |
25 |
46.20% |
29 |
|
|
| Dubois |
65 |
1.1 |
168.8 |
54 |
0.9 |
139.3 |
53 |
0.9 |
136.2 |
76 |
-19.30% |
81 |
|
|
| Gibson |
48 |
0.9 |
148 |
58 |
1 |
177.7 |
77 |
1.3 |
235 |
19 |
58.76% |
16 |
|
|
| Knox |
69 |
1.3 |
170.7 |
72 |
1.3 |
177 |
91 |
1.3 |
222.8 |
27 |
30.52% |
50 |
|
|
| Martin |
21 |
1.4 |
196.7 |
18 |
1.3 |
167.5 |
22 |
1.2 |
204 |
41 |
3.69% |
72 |
|
|
| Perry |
26 |
0.8 |
135.7 |
26 |
0.8 |
134.8 |
24 |
0.6 |
123.9 |
81 |
-8.64% |
78 |
|
|
| Pike |
18 |
1.1 |
141.3 |
21 |
1.2 |
163.8 |
25 |
1.2 |
194.2 |
44 |
37.46% |
43 |
|
|
| Posey |
35 |
0.8 |
131.7 |
25 |
0.6 |
93.46 |
45 |
1.1 |
167.6 |
58 |
27.25% |
53 |
|
|
| Spencer |
25 |
1.1 |
123 |
27 |
1.1 |
132 |
34 |
1.1 |
165.6 |
64 |
34.59% |
48 |
|
|
| Vanderburgh |
99 |
0.3 |
58.6 |
73 |
0.2 |
42.93 |
76 |
0.2 |
44.52 |
90 |
-24.03% |
86 |
|
|
| Warrick |
42 |
0.7 |
85.62 |
46 |
0.7 |
93.16 |
67 |
1 |
135.2 |
77 |
57.87% |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Indiana |
9,727 |
0.9 |
167.6 |
11,134 |
1 |
190.6 |
12,294 |
1 |
209.7 |
NA |
25.08% |
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NR: None Reported. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TL: Total Marijuana Arrests Reported. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AQ: Arrest Quotient. This indicator compares local marijuana
arrests to national marijuana arrests in proportion to all arrests. |
| The
AQ is produced through dividing the local percentage of marijuana arrests by
the national percentage. A value of
1.0 indicates |
| that local
marijuana arrests are the same percentage of all arrests as they are
nationally. A value of 2.0 indicates
that local marijuana |
| arrests are
twice the percentage of local arrests as they are nationally. AQ values less than 1.0 indicate that
local marijuana arrests |
| are less of a
percentage of all local arrests than the national standard. A value of .5 indicates that local
marijuana arrests. |
| are one half
the percentage they represent of all national arrests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RATE: Marijuana arrest rate per 100,000 population. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CHANGE: Percent change in arrest rate from 1995 to 1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Citation: Gettman, Jon B. (2000) "US Marijuana Arrests. Part One
– County Level Data" |
|
| Washington,
D.C.: National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Original Data
Source: Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data [United
States]: County-Level Detailed |
|
| Arrest
And Offense Data, [Computer files]. ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university
Consortium |
|
| for Political
and Social Research [producer and distributor], 1999. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Web source: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| http://norml.org/facts/arrestreport/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|